Nova Scotia's Trappers Newsletter 2002



Collections required this year: Fisher, otter and acccidental catches of marten and lynx. Submission of accidental catches of flying squirrels is voluntary. Also a voluntary collection of wild mink from the Southwestern part of the province is needed as part of continued research on mercury contamination of top line predators. This information will be collected in conjunction with three other states along the northeastern coast.


Regulation Changes for 2002/2003

The major regulation changes affecting fur harvesters for the 2002/2003 season are:

  1. A special coyote hunting permit is no longer required to hunt coyotes with a rifle after the deer season.
  2. Accidentally captured furbearers to which a trapper is not entitled may be transported immediately if the Accidental Harvest Form is completed.



Table of Contents

Note: Due to government budget restraints, the Trappers Newsletter will not be mailed out to trappers. Trappers can pick up their copy of the Trappers Newsletter at their local area office. A limited number of copies will be made available for the general public at local district offices. Alternatively, the publication will be available on the wildlife web site, at www.gov.ns.ca/natr/wildlife/furbers/newslet/newslet.htm .

Anyone seeking further information on furbearer management or wishing to provide input to the Department of Natural Resources should contact their local office, a Regional Biologist, or the Furbearer and Upland Game Section of DNR, Attn.:Mike O'Brien, 136 Exhibition Street Kentville, N.S. - B4N 4E5. By e-mail: O'Brienms@gov.ns.ca Phone: (902) 679-6091 Fax: (902) 679-6176. The Furbearer Section, including Trappers Newsletter, is on the Internet: https://novascotia.ca/Natr/wildlife/furbers/furbs.htm Accidental catches or sightings of rare species may also be reported by calling 1 (800) 565-2224.



Mandatory Fur
Harvester Courses


Courses take place each year in late September. Since 1986, 70 Fur Harvester courses have been held and there have been a total of 1423 students. Application forms are available at all local DNR offices, and may be submitted throughout the year. Registration and payment must be received by TANS secretary not later than August 15 in order to guarantee a place in a courses for the fall. Students registered by August 15 will receive notification of their course date and location in early September; participants are required to confirm their attendance by September15. Anyone unable to attend must also notify DNR, Wildlife Division in Kentville, otherwise their name will be removed from the course waiting list, and their registration fee forfeited.


Furbearer Report
By Mike O=Brien and Mike Boudreau

The number of fur harvester licenses sold in the 2001-02 season increased by 4.42 % to 1516. The level of effort by those who did buy a license and catch fur has increased from 54.3% to about 61.3% in the 2001-02 season.

Average fur prices increased in almost every species with the exception of beaver, skunk, bear and weasel which moved at relaxed prices. While bobcat showed a substantial increase in average price, otter, fox and coyote had good clearances. Even the raccoon seemed to move well and had good clearances despite it’s struggles in the past few years. Many trappers did not trap early in the season, mainly because of poor forecast for early unprimed fur and waited to go after fur when it was fully prime. This may have helped influence the rising prices.


Snowshoe hare

Snowshoe hares, or rabbits as we Nova Scotians call them, are an important prey species for several furbearers. Abundance rankings made by furharvesters show an overall increase in snowshoe hare across the province, with a hand full of counties showing a slight decrease. Upland game harvest survey results showed a very poor return rate for the report cards again this year. The number of snowshoe hares harvested increased slightly with an estimated harvest of 99,660 overall. The annual pellet plot surveys showed a increasing trend for snowshoe hare as well.


Bobcat

The bobcat harvest was up by 16.57% from the last year, with a total of 1394 animals taken. This increase probably partly reflects an increase in effort. Average prices have been increasing over the last couple of years and may have contributed to increased effort during the past season. Abundance rankings for the province have begun to show slight decreases with the exception of Annapolis, Kings, Lunenburg, Yarmouth, Pictou, Cape Breton and Antigonish counties, all of which continue to show a slight increase in rankings


Beaver

The provincial beaver harvest increased by 33.91% to 5792 animals, and still remains moderately high. Pelt prices decreased slightly this year, however they are still higher than the 1998-99 season averages.

Provincial abundance rankings showed a slight increase province wide. After discussions with Department staff field and trappers, the bag limits have been set at the same levels as last year in all four zones. We recognize the fact that trappers often trap other aquatic furbearerbag limits (suwhich they permanently reside. As a result, regulations were recently changed to allow trappers to retain beaver taken in any zone. This is provided that they do not exceed in total the bag limit for the zone in which they permanently reside, and do not take in any one zone more than the bag limit for that zone. It appears that after four years this change has not resulted in any major harvest management problems, and is providing us with an improved picture of the geographic distribution of our beaver harvest.


Otters

Otter harvests have increased this year by 28.48% to a level of 625 animals. This is still in the middle of the range for harvests in recent years. The average price increased slightly from the previous year. Abundance rankings showed a marginal increase on the provincial scale, however remain in the low to medium range. We are again collecting otter carcasses this year to continue to improve our understanding of what is happening with the otter population. Preliminary results suggest that otter, like other fish-eating species, are being affected in some parts of Nova Scotia by environmental mercury contamination. The status of this species will be monitored to ensure the maintenance of a sustainable population.


Muskrat

Muskrat catches increased this year by 28.69 % to 18,779. This is the highest level in the last couple of years. The average price increased slightly to $5.58 which is the highest since the 1996-97. The provincial abundance levels are up slightly.


Fisher

Fisher abundance rankings, provided by licensed furharvesters, took a slight increase this year, yet keeping fisher in the low range. Regulations remain the same this season allowing retention of one accidentally caught fisher in Cumberland , Colchester and Pictou counties, with the remainder of the province closed. A 33.86 % increase in the harvest, brought the total catch to 127 animals. While the harvest of the past seven seasons continues to be encouraging, we will need to continue close monitoring of this species to ensure continued population recovery and expansion. A final report on the fisher live capture, translocation and habitat research project can be found in the next issue of the Trappers Newsletter. Following an offer of financial support from the Trappers Association of Nova Scotia (TANS), we plan to continue the project again this year. Additional animals will be live- trapped and moved from Colchester, Cumberland and Pictou counties to the south central part of the province. This will hopefully bolster fisher numbers there, and eventually connect the eastern and western fisher populations. To increase the impact of this program and to protect relocated animals, regulations will remain the same as last year: trappers resident in Cumberland, Colchester or Pictou counties will be able to retain one accidentally caught fisher if caught in Cumberland, Colchester or Pictou counties only. Fisher that are accidentally caught in all other areas of the province must be turned in to DNR, at least for the duration of this project. As with all seasons and bag limits, this regulation will be reviewed annually.


Raccoon

Raccoon harvests have increased by 48.29 % to a level of 2725 animals. Abundance rankings increased slightly from last year. Average price for raccoons increased from last year, with good clearance of stock by both auction houses. Outbreaks of distemper will likely continue to result in lower populations in affected areas.


Fox

Fox harvest increased by 38.39 % to a level of 797 animals. Provincial abundance rankings remained the same with slight changes in a hand full of counties. Prices increased only slightly from the previous year.


Coyote

Coyote harvest increased by 47.41% to 1588 animals. This harvest was the highest since the 1994-95 season, which at that time was 1887 animals. Overall abundance rankings were up and continue on an upward climb. Average price increased slightly from the relatively stable price of the previous years.


Other Species

Squirrel harvest increased significantly by 39.92 % to a level of 4251. Weasels increased by 47.81 % to 1075 animals. Skunk harvest decreased by 9.09 % to reach a level of 96. Lynx and marten continue to be taken accidentally each year and trappers should make every effort to avoid accidental capture of these species.


Accidental Captures

Furharvesters who accidentally catch protected species or animals in excess of their bag limits should try to release them alive if practical. If not practical, you must report your catch to an office of the Department of Natural Resources before it is removed from the trap site. This may be done by calling any DNR office, or calling 1-800-565-2224, 24 hours a day. Starting in the fall of 2002 trappers now have the option to take possession and transport the animal immediately, provided the Accidental Harvest Form is completed at the trap site. Upon arriving at their place of residence the trapper is obligated to call any DNR office, or calling 1-800-565-2224, 24 hours a day and report their catch. The office will advise you on how to handle the situation. Anyone found in the position of an animal to which they are not entitled without first notifying the Department or having the appropriate form filled out may be charged. Most animals turned in to DNR are used for demonstration and pelt handling training at the TANS annual workshop. These pelts along with other pelts which are turned into the Department are then given to the Trappers Association of Nova Scotia. Proceeds from the sale of pelts are used to support trapper education.


*****************************************

Fur Marketing Information

North American Fur Producers Marketing Inc.
65 Skyway Ave., Rexdale, Ontario
M9W 6C7
Phone: 416-675-9320
Nova Scotia Representative,
Furafee Trading Inc.
115 Brunswick St., Truro, NS B2N 4P6
Phone: 902-895-2511

2002--2003 Auction Dates:
Sale Date: January 14, 2003
Last Receiving Date: December 9, 2002

Sale Date: February 24 & 25, 2003
Last Receiving Date: January 13, 2003

Sale Date: May 14 & 15, 2003
Last Receiving Date: March 31, 2003

Sale Date: September 2003
Last Receiving Date: June 2, 2003


Furharvesters Auction Inc.
Furharvesters Auction Sales Inc.
1971 Bond St., North Bay, Ontario P1B 4V7
Phone: 705-495-4688
Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island
Representative
Mark Marshall, R.R. #1 Barton, Digby, NS
Phone: 902-837-4300

 2002-2003 Auction Dates:
Sale Date: December 15, 2002
Last Receiving Date: November 30, 2002

Sale Date: February 15, 2003
Last Receiving Date: January 11, 2003

Sale Date: May 20, 2003
Last Receiving Date: April 12, 2003

Sale Date: June 23, 2003
Last Receiving Date: May 31, 2003


*****************************************



Fur Harvest as Calculated from License Returns
and Fur Buyer Slips in 2000 - 2001

County B'ver M'krat Otter Mink B'cat Fox R'coon S'knk S'qrrel W'sel C'yote Fisher
Anna. 169 1426 31 39 45 26 18 0 85 40 25 0
Digby 180 507 19 286 32 12 109 1 838 27 48 1
Kings 70 1614 8 53 24 31 188 0 69 3 75 3
Lunen. 298 196 34 114 89 48 81 0 268 36 64 1
Queens 119 46 18 39 55 5 27 1 22 13 31 1
Shel. 113 738 25 23 69 4 9 0 7 14 16 0
Yar. 159 1843 17 304 55 17 82 0 334 27 42 3
Ant. 251 354 36 10 48 24 101 0 44 17 77 3
Col. 302 1180 14 44 54 74 115 3 121 7 51 20
Cumb. 474 3752 9 60 116 39 229 1 39 25 83 37
Guys. 157 63 51 34 43 4 13 0 102 23 29 0
Hfx. 357 511 66 131 131 37 115 0 100 60 70 2
Hants 206 288 14 27 59 29 74 0 44 15 36 0
P'tou 387 270 14 7 59 33 216 102 17 4 29 13
CB 228 200 24 53 70 39 14 0 2 12 32 0
Inv. 135 261 24 16 126 37 6 0 424 186 56 0
Rich. 148 91 35 25 53 27 10 0 14 36 41 0
Vic. 75 51 8 2 35 5 2 0 24 16 30 0
Total 3,828 13,391 447 1,267 1,163 491 1,409 108 2,554 561 835 84




Fur Harvest as Calculated from License Returns
and Fur Buyer Slips in 2001 - 2002

County B'ver M'krat Otter Mink B'cat Fox R'coon S'knk S'qrrel W'sel C'yote Fisher
Anna. 257 2019 19 64 74 56 43 2 303 53 69 5
Digby 311 839 17 512 26 28 164 10 1831 65 74 4
Kings 118 2284 10 100 48 40 403 1 301 22 78 5
Lunen. 375 241 59 100 124 70 239 0 214 66 137 1
Queens 170 75 32 40 65 3 60 3 34 32 52 1
Shel. 165 1056 27 29 02 12 22 0 35 26 48 0
Yar. 275 2270 21 492 81 28 183 9 202 42 85 3
Ant. 257 382 38 17 81 28 183 9 202 42 85 3
Col. 387 1445 19 71 85 86 290 3 55 62 154 28
Cumb. 965 5581 32 103 109 148 436 0 75 98 198 49
Guys. 232 143 73 47 69 6 23 0 65 82 52 0
Hfx. 537 853 111 147 138 67 152 1 70 125 108 0
Hants 265 364 20 44 77 40 153 2 75 48 114 0
Pictou 650 545 23 21 126 65 286 65 88 29 67 31
CBreton 263 219 17 29 65 69 32 0 5 23 52 0
Inv. 296 311 32 29 54 23 15 0 490 138 97 1
Rich. 182 120 57 34 50 32 8 0 29 47 62 0
Vic. 87 32 18 10 20 9 4 0 28 24 60 0
Total 5,792 18,779 625 1,889 1,394 797 2,725 96 4,251 1,075 1,587 128




Average Value of Wild Fur for Nova Scotia (Per Pelt)

Year 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
B'ver $32.30 $27.34 $32.37 $43.00 $34.90 $25.39 $31.06 $32.16 $27.28
M'krat $2.94 $3.26 $3.82 $7.06 $4.32 $3.17 $4.22 $4.36 $5.58
Otter $106.47 $88.73 $63.65 $72.42 $72.43 $53.50 $92.19 $90.57 $111.58
Mink $22.60 $15.16 $19.54 $19.09 $18.84 $15.70 $17.85 $14.83 $17.00
B'cat $72.35 $66.84 $44.32 $76.96 $58.95 $48.92 $54.37 $61.86 $128.40
Fox $24.43 $25c69 $24.43 $25.59 $23.38 $16.79 $29.16 $30.89 $37.83
R'coon $15.67 $14.35 $14.62 $23.97 $21.53 $12.14 $8.15 $16.66 $19.38
W'sel $4.54 $3.05 $3.61 $5.69 $2.88 $2.90 $3.26 $4.94 $3.83
S'qrrel $1.00 $1.00 $0.77 $2.42 $1.05 $0.74 $0.99 $1.73 $1.98
S'knk $4.01 $3.60 $4.29 $4.00 $1.97 $4.37 $1.76 $8.85 $8.41
Fisher $27.08 $19.95 $29.79 $46.64 $39.93 $28.12 $22.31 $32.87 $44.09
Bear $76.64 $64.59 $51.12 $99.21 $76.47 $70.57 $113.21 $149.43 $117.28
C'yote $35.32 $22.36 $20.00 $33.14 $20.25 $20.53 $25.83 $25.02 $31.33



Fur Bearing Animals Taken by Fur Harvesters
From 1993 - 2002

Year 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
B'ver 4,801 7,677 6,090 8,642 6,385 5,807 4,126 3,828 5,792
M'krat 12,956 18,248 22,118 36,834 31,531 26,623 15,859 13,391 18,779
Otter 585 1,027 797 765 555 478 440 447 625
Mink 1,531 1,929 1,829 2,168 1,681 1,724 1,686 1,267 1,889
B'cat 499 809 703 976 1,029 1,103 1,403 1,163 1,394
Fox 846 1,741 1,118 1,549 898 841 662 491 797
R'coon 3,599 6,676 5,435 6,490 6,165 5,577 2,018 1,409 2,725
W'sel 1,164 1,207 1,375 1,037 602 468 1,156 561 1,075
S'qrrel 1,914 6,852 8,355 6,890 5,199 6,543 1,486 2,554 4,251
S'knk 122 168 131 229 74 151 247 108 96
Fisher 9 16 124 217 184 131 115 84 128
Coyote 1,087 1,887 1,155 1,311 1,031 1,254 1,388 835 1,587



Fur Harvester License Sales

93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
Anna. 92 105 92 96 102 77 69 66 72
Ant. 63 72 70 82 75 68 62 67 60
Col. 112 134 136 137 115 83 127 113 85
Cumb. 177 211 200 216 181 137 163 159 153
Digby 82 111 102 110 86 108 75 88 85
Guys. 93 106 66 71 77 84 60 56 84
Hfx 181 200 139 190 190 104 119 90 158
Hants 91 106 89 99 107 70 74 79 65
Kings 112 126 110 111 106 97 84 82 80
Lunen. 123 125 116 117 106 107 84 87 89
Pictou 154 163 157 169 159 140 118 109 144
Queens 72 79 68 76 76 65 44 40 59
Shel. 91 107 99 100 94 90 74 69 70
Yar. 120 137 127 151 145 128 114 117 98
CBreton 88 100 94 97 110 83 74 73 69
Inv. 82 92 85 82 80 75 69 71 66
Rich. 63 76 68 76 70 74 58 64 61
Vic. 41 40 32 37 24 20 29 19 18
Total 1,837 2,091 1,850 2,017 1,903 1,649 1,497 1,449 1,516



Bag Limit Changes

Bobcat
- Bag Limit Increased to Two Province-Wide in 1990-91
- Bag Limit Reduced to One Province-Wide in 1991-92
- Bag Limit Increased to Two Province-Wide in 1993-94
- Bag Limit Reduced to One in Cumberland and Colchester Counties in 1994-95
- Bag Limit Increased to Three Province-Wide (except Cumb/Col) in 1995-96
- Bag Limit Increased to Four Province-Wide (except Cumb/Col) in 1996-97
- Bag Limit Increased from One to Four in Colchester County in 1997-98
- Bag Limit Increased from Four to Five Province-Wide except for Cumberland County in 1998-99
- Bag Limit Increased to Five Province-Wide in 1999-00
Fisher
- Season Closed in 1988-89 to 1994-95
- One Mistake Fisher Allowed in 1995-96, 1996-97, and in 1997/98
- One Mistake Fisher Allowed in Cumberland, Colchester and Pictou Counties only in 1998-99 to 2001-02
Marten
Season Closed
Lynx
Season Closed



Species Abundance as Recorded by Fur Harvesters
By Mike O=Brien and Mike Boudreau

Fur harvesters were asked again last year to record their perception of population levels for 16 animal species. Population levels for five of those species have been reported for thirteen years, while population levels for the other nine species have been added more recently. This has been a very successful program as it gives us the ability to draw on hundreds of skilled observers, who tell us how abundant each species is in their area. We encourage all fur harvesters to fill in this section of their report form, as higher numbers of participants increases the accuracy of the data.

Rankings for individual counties may not provide a reliable picture of annual trends because of low response numbers from some areas. The summaries for each of the three regions, as well as the provincial totals, are considered very reliable. The table shows results for the 2001-02 season. The numbers are averages calculated by assigning values to the ranks selected by each fur harvester. The values given to the ranks are shown under the table.

The lowest possible value for a County is “0", which means that all respondents in that County felt that none of that particular species was present in their area. The highest possible value is “4", which means that all respondents from that County felt that numbers for that species were “very high”.

This type of information is most valuable when looking at changes from year to year, and graphs are presented to show the rankings for five species over a nine year period for all of Nova Scotia.



Fur Harvest Abundance Estimates for 2002

Western
Anna. Digby Kings Lunen. Queens Shel. Yar. WESTERN
B'ver 2.47 2.15 2.10 2.10 2.41 1.96 2.22 2.19
M'krat 1.91 2.02 1.89 1.60 1.90 1.87 2.23 1.93
Otter 1.49 1.21 1.61 1.72 1.62 1.48 1.27 1.48
Mink 1.65 1.98 1.76 1.75 1.52 1.30 2.07 1.74
B'cat 2.24 1.56 1.97 2.09 1.94 2.22 2.06 2.04
Fox 1.34 1.44 1.57 1.68 1.32 1.13 1.32 1.41
R'coon 1.49 1.76 2.43 1.96 2.26 1.80 1.96 1.93
Skunk 2.43 1.33 2.50 1.84 1.25 0.58 0.73 1.69
S'qrrel 3.02 2.47 2.59 2.78 3.00 2.72 2.65 2.74
W'sel 1.74 1.51 1.78 1.83 1.48 1.83 1.85 1.73
C'yote 3.02 2.98 2.87 2.71 2.78 2.82 2.68 2.83
Fisher 0.84 1.28 0.95 0.80 0.47 0.34 1.30 0.82
Bear 2.11 1.48 1.90 1.84 2.07 1.92 1.81 1.89
Hare 1.71 2.17 1.30 1.54 1.53 1.77 1.69 1.68
Lynx 0.16 1.50 0.25 0.24 0.60 0.06 1.00 0.34
Marten 0.26 1.13 0.07 0.31 0.36 0.06 1.13 0.36


Eastern
Ant. Col. Cumb. Guys. Halifax Hants Pictou EASTERN
B'ver 2.56 2.45 2.26 2.54 2.21 2.32 2.46 2.38
M'krat 1.71 1.78 1.87 1.62 1.69 1.85 2.06 1.82
Otter 1.78 1.76 1.25 2.00 1.54 1.62 1.56 1.60
Mink 1.39 1.57 1.46 1.44 1.76 1.49 1.58 1.54
B'cat 2.42 2.30 1.84 1.88 2.04 2.28 2.42 2.14
Fox 2.08 1.83 1.96 1.04 1.51 1.72 2.02 1.75
R'coon 2.06 2.17 2.17 1.98 1.66 1.84 2.20 2.02
Skunk 2.30 2.25 2.07 1.33 1.46 2.33 2.75 2.08
S'qrrel 2.63 2.56 2.64 2.61 2.34 2.63 2.86 2.63
W'sel 1.87 2.15 1.91 2.19 1.84 2.20 2.11 2.03
C'yote 3.11 3.07 2.67 2.86 2.63 3.10 2.95 2.87
Fisher 0.62 1.97 1.63 0.33 0.46 0.29 1.79 1.13
Bear 1.72 1.90 2.29 1.46 1.77 1.57 2.00 1.86
Hare 1.29 1.62 1.36 1.34 1.30 1.50 1.73 1.45
Lynx 0.60 2.00 0.12 0.09 0.18 0.10 0.27 0.22
Marten 0.21 1.33 0.07 0.09 0.27 0.08 0.41 0.21


Cape Breton
Cape Breton Inverness Richmond Victoria CAPE BRETON PROVINCIAL
B'ver 2.27 1.95 1.76 1.88 2.00 2.25
M'krat 1.36 1.37 1.51 2.00 1.44 1.81
Otter 1.53 1.49 1.78 1.50 1.59 1.56
Mink 1.62 1.37 1.56 1.50 1.51 1.61
B'cat 2.16 2.02 1.94 2.27 2.06 2.09
Fox 2.09 1.55 1.89 1.92 1.84 1.65
R'coon 2.17 1.15 1.38 1.83 1.57 1.92
Skunk 0.60 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.10 1.78
S'qrrel 2.24 2.65 2.55 2.33 2.48 2.65
W'sel 1.94 2.14 2.11 2.00 2.06 1.93
C'yote 2.98 2.93 2.84 3.17 2.94 2.87
Fisher 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.94
Bear 1.50 1.47 0.64 2.22 1.13 1.78
Hare 1.12 1.05 1.12 1.08 1.1 1.4
Lynx 0.85 1.94 1.26 1.5 1.4 0.4
Marten 0.1 0.16 0 0.25 0.09 0.16






Species at Risk in Nova Scotia

Wildlife species protected under the Nova Scotia Endangered Species Act

As this issue of the Trappers Newsletter was going to press, Tim Olive, the Nova Scotia Minister of Natural Resources, announced the addition of four species, a bird, plant, fish and mammal, that will now be protected by the province’s Endangered Species Act.

Of particular interest to trappers is the listing of Lynx as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act. Endangered means they could become extinct in Nova Scotia if steps to remove the threats to these species are not taken. Lynx formally occurred in areas of suitable habitat across mainland Nova Scotia and Cape Breton Island. The current population is very small and restricted to two areas in the highlands of Cape Breton Island. Historic and current threats to Lynx include: harvesting, competition from bobcats and coyotes, habitat loss, disease and climate change.

You should now be aware that both lynx and marten are protected under the Endangered Species Act.

As a trapper, you can help in several ways:
  • Carefully release any live lynx accidentally captured in a trap.
  • Report and submit any lynx accidentally killed in a trap to your local DNR office.
  • Keep a written record of where and when you see lynx or lynx signs during the trapping season. Return it along with your Fur Harvester Report at the end of the trapping season.

For more information contact your local DNR office or the Wildlife Division office in Kentville at 679-6091.


See the Furbearers Website:

https://novascotia.ca/NATR/WILDLIFE/furbers/furbs.htm

For the new Internet-based:

Furharvesters Report Form
Small Game Report Form
&
Applications for Fur Harvester Education Programs





Traps Meeting Requirements of Agreement on
International Human Trapping Standards

Updated August 1, 2001


Killing Traps

Species Traps Tested and Found to Meet the

Requirements of the AIHTS

Certified

AIHTS*

Beaver Belisle Super X 330 X
(on land & underwater) BMI 330
Bridger 330
LDL C 330 X
Rudy 330 X
Sauvageau 2002 - 11 X
Species-Specific 330 Dislocator Half Magnum
Species-Specific 430 Dislocator Half Magnum
Woodstream Oneida Victor Conibear 330
Beaver BMI 280
(underwater) Belisle Super X 280 X
LDL 280 X
Rudy 280 X
Sauvageau 2001 - 8 X
Woodstream Oneida Victor Conibear 280
River Otter (underwater) Woodstream Oneida Victor Conibear 330
Weasel Victor Rat Trap
Fisher Sauvageau 2001- 8 X
Marten Belisle Super X 120 X
BMI 126 Magnum
LDL B120 Magnum X
Rudy 120 Magnum X
Sauvageau C 120 Magnum X
Sauvageau 2001 - 5 X
Muskrat (on land) Woodstream Oneida Victor Conibear 110
Woodstream Oneida Victor Conibear 120
Triple M
Muskrat (underwater) Woodstream Oneida Victor Conibear 110
Jaw-type leghold trap with submersion system
Lynx Woodstream Oneida Victor Conibear 330
Raccoon Belisle Super X 160 X
Belisle Super X 220 X
BMI 160
BMI 220
Bridger 220
LDL 160 X
LDL 220 X
Rudy 220 X
Sauvageau 2001 - 6 X
Sauvageau 2001 - 7 X
Sauvageau 2001 - 8
Species - Specific 220 Half Magnum
Woodstream Oneida Victor Conibear 160
Woodstream Oneida Victor Conibear 220

Traps CERTIFIED to meet the requirements of the AIHTS*

These traps meet the time to loss of consciousness and sensibility thresholds as set out in the Agreement.

Killing traps similar to those listed above could meet these standards, provided that their mechanical values are shown, through testing, to be adequate.


Restraining Traps

Species Traps Tested and Found to Meet the Requirements of the AIHTS CERTIFIED AIHTS*
Lynx Belisle Footsnare X
Victor #3 Soft Catch (unmodified)
Victor #3 Soft Catch equipped with 4 coil springs
Victor #3 equipped with 3/16 inch jaw laminations & 4 coil springs and a swivel center mounted on base plate
Bobcat Belisle Footsnare X
Coyote Belisle Footsnare X
Bridger #3 Equipped with 5/16 inch offset, double rounded jaw laminations (3/16 inch on topside of jaws and 1/4 inch on underside of jaws), with 4 coil springs and a swivel center mounted on base plate.


These traps meet the injury thresholds as set out in the Agreement.

The above lists apply to traps meeting specific performance requirements as set out in the Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards. They are subject to certification by 2007, by the provincial and territorial governments and those Aboriginal agencies sanctioned to regulate trapping methods.

**************************************

The tables preceding were reproduced from information produced and provided by the Trap Research and Development Committee (TRDC) of the Fur Institute of Canada (FIC). The TRDC of the FIC continues to make significant progress in testing both commonly used and newly developed and modified traps against the Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards (AIHTS). The measure of this progress is clearly evidenced in the numbers of traps which have been rated and added to the list of those found to meet the thresholds set out in the AIHTS.

The FIC-TRDC website at http://www.fur.ca/humane_trap/results2.html provides access to the most up to date published list of traps found to meet the requirements of the AIHTS. Please check periodically for new traps which may have been added to the list.




Trap Standards - 2002 Update on the EU Agreement
By Mike O'Brien

In late 1997, the European Union (EU), Canada, and Russia signed the Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards (AIHTS or the Agreement). This Agreement averted the implementation of European legislation that would have prohibited the importing of 13 species of wild furs into Europe from Canada. The effects of such a ban would have been very serious, directly affecting all our major furbearing species except mink and fox. Likely, even the market for these would have been indirectly affected. The industry has been seeking and developing alternative markets (for example Asian countries), but the European market still currently accounts for approximately 70 per cent of the market for Canadian wild fur.

The United States had previously withdrawn from the official Canada-EU-Russia negotiations. As a result, in late 1997, the US concluded a separate understanding with the EU which is similar to the one agreed to by Canada, though a bit more lenient. Consequently, complications and negative effects of having US fur blocked out of EU markets were also averted.

A major event in the implementation of the AIHTS occurred on June 1, 1999, with the ratification of the Agreement by Canada on a bilateral basis with the EU. The bilateral option had been included to allow for the Agreement to move forward in the event that Russia was unable to ratify within a reasonable time period. After careful consideration of the options available, including the risks and uncertainties of leaving the Agreement unratified in the face of changes in the EU administration, the various Canadian stakeholders asked the federal government to proceed with the bilateral ratification. Prior to ratification, consultations had taken place with our US counterparts on this issue. The US agreement with the EU only went into effect in the event of full ratification of the AIHTS by Canada, Russia, and the EU. However, after Canada’s ratification in June, the US decided in August 1999 to also bring their agreement into force as of June 1, 1999. Canada continues to make every effort to encourage and support Russian ratification at the earliest possible opportunity, but this has still not occurred.

The signing of this Agreement with the EU has kept the critical European marketplace open to Canadian wild furs. However, it was reached only at considerable cost to the wild fur producing nations. With the initialing of the original Agreement in 1997, we became obligated to ban the use of conventional steel-jawed leghold restraining traps not later than the end of the 2000-01 trapping season - regardless of whether or not the traps would otherwise pass thresholds set for restraining trap standards ( which is very likely for some species). Last year the Canadian provinces and territories made the necessary regulatory changes to ensure that we were in compliance with our commitments in relation to this particular aspect of the Agreement. Please consult the 2002 Nova Scotia Hunting and Furharvesting Licence and Summary of Regulations booklet, also available on the internet at https://novascotia.ca/natr/hunt/regulations/default.htm , or contact your local DNR office for information on which restraining traps are currently permitted for various species.

The bilateral ratification of the Agreement on June 1, 1999 started the clock ticking on the schedule for testing of various other restraining and killing trap systems against the standards in the AIHTS. Considerable work had already been done prior to that time and significant progress has been made in the past three years through the Fur Institute of Canada’s Trap Research and Development program (see the List of Traps which have been found to meet the AIHTS, page 12 of this issue of Nova Scotia Trappers Newsletter or on the website of the Fur Institute of Canada at http://www.fur.ca/). Watch the FIC website for regular updates as more results become available). Results of trap testing, which have shown that some commonly used traps for several species will meet the AIHTS standards is welcome news for furharvesters. Significant effort and expense over a relatively short time frame will continue to be required to test and improve traps and trapping systems, to ensure that trappers will be able to continue to efficiently harvest wild furbearers.

As a result of the AIHTS, the markets for North American furs are still open. We can certainly be proud of the many capable representatives from the various players in the fur industry (such as governments, the Fur Institute of Canada, trapper organizations, fur auctions, fur farmers, etc.) who have made, and continue to make, important contributions toward dealing with this situation. Unfortunately, this is not simply an issue of science, factual information, and technological improvement, but also of animal rights, public relations campaigns, strong emotions, and politics. And though the threat to the EU markets may have been successfully resolved, lobby groups will undoubtedly continue their attacks on the industry in other arenas. Canada’s leadership in humane trap standards, trapping system research and development, fur harvester training, furbearer conservation and management, and in implementing this Agreement are strong demonstrations of our commitment to humane, sustainable furbearer resource utilization.

In late September 1997, a meeting was held in Quebec City between representatives of federal, provincial, and territorial government agencies, aboriginal peoples, and trappers to discuss the implications and requirements of the Agreement. Discussion centered around timetables and options available for complying with the Agreement, along with such issues as direction and funding for required trap testing, research, certification, and coordination between different jurisdictions. While the federal government coordinated negotiations and signed the Agreement on behalf of Canada, the actual mandate for managing furbearing species rests with the provincial, territorial, and aboriginal land claim governments. Consequently, only they can implement the requirements of the Agreement, and approaches for doing this may vary between jurisdictions.

Following the meeting in Quebec, discussions between the various jurisdictions and interest groups on implementation and coordination have continued both nationally and internationally. The Trap Research and Development Committee of the Fur Institute of Canada is leading the trap testing and development work for our country. Its primary goal is to ensure that effective, economical, safe and humane traps are available for Canadian trappers. The FIC, together with representatives of the provinces and territories, have maintained a close and coordinated cooperation with US and Russian cooperators in trap research and issues around the implementation of the AIHTS. Following on the success of the FIC research program in developing computer models for rating killing traps against the AIHTS standards, Canada and the US have begun work on the cooperative development of trap performance models for leghold restraining devices. The results of this project have potential to significantly enhance our ability to assess performance of such restraining traps. The Canada-US cooperative approach should allow exploration of this potential more quickly than either party would likely have been able to do independently. The FIC also plays a key role in facilitating information dissemination and education in addition to many other processes and activities necessary for the implementation of the Agreement.

The Canadian Furbearer Management Committee (CFMC) - a national committee comprised of representatives from each of the provincial and territorial government wildlife agencies, reporting to the Provincial/Territorial Wildlife Directors) has been working on various issues to ensure harmonization and coordination of interpretation and implementation of the Agreement in the various Canadian jurisdictions. The CFMC has now completed the process for “certification” of traps, as required in the Agreement. This process has now been put in place for use by the provincial and territorial wildlife agencies and provides the framework for certification of traps by these ‘competent authorities’ as complying with the requirements of the AIHTS. In addition to considering performance of traps against the animal welfare requirements of the AIHTS, certification also takes into account safety and efficiency of trapping devices. The requirement for traps used to capture furbearers to be certified as meeting the AIHTS does not actually go into effect until 2007. However, with the certification process now in place, manufacturers have already begun to submit qualifying traps for certification. As a result, manufacturers, trappers, and wildlife management agencies will now have the opportunity to know as soon as possible which devices have been certified as meeting the AIHTS, well in advance of the 2007 deadline. In order to provide information to trappers on which traps have actually been certified, the current list of traps which have been found to meet the animal welfare requirements of the AIHTS (see page 12) now also includes a second column to indicate whether the trap has been certified. The CFMC also advises the Wildlife Directors on other furbearer management related issues, and provides representation for the provincial and territorial jurisdictions at various international meetings pertaining to the implementation of the Agreement.

The Canadian Wildlife Directors have moved ahead with the formation and mandating of the Canadian Advisory Committee for the implementation of the AIHTS. From that group will come direction on the composition of the Canadian delegation to the AIHTS Joint Management Committee, as well as on the actual priorities and direction of that delegation. Canada hosted a provisional meeting of the Joint Management Committee in June of 2000 in Edmonton. Attendance at that meeting consisted of representatives of Canada and EU (currently the only signatories who have ratified the Agreement), along with invited representatives of Russia and the USA. Reports tabled at the meeting detailed the status of trap testing and research in the respective jurisdictions. A second provisional meeting had been scheduled for June 2001, to be hosted by the EU. The EU postponed that meeting and a meeting is now scheduled for late October 2002. Canada, US and Russia will have considerable progress and success to report at that meeting. Traps also continue to be used in the EU for a variety of purposes, so it will be interesting to receive information on what work has been completed there to comply with EU obligations under the AIHTS.

Trappers and trapper organizations continue (along with other stakeholders when appropriate) to play key roles in various aspects of the efforts surrounding this Agreement including participation in FIC activities and committees, cooperation in trap testing, research and development, delivery and development of furharvester education, representation on international delegations, and direct input to provincial and territorial governments. Anyone wanting more details on the EU Agreement and how it will affect trappers here and in other parts of Canada, as well as information on trap research and development, trap certification, or related topics, should contact the Furbearers and Upland Game Section of the Wildlife Division, Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources (contact information can be found inside the front cover of Nova Scotia Trappers Newsletter).

Undoubtedly the fur industry faces difficulties now and in the future. However, continued hard work and cooperation between government, fur harvesters, and other players in the industry should ensure the continued wise use of this natural resource, as well as the survival of a distinctly North American industry and way of life.



American Pine Marten in Nova Scotia
by Dennis Brannen and Peter Austin-Smith Jr.

The American pine marten is a small member of the weasel family, about the size of a mink. It has chocolate brown fur, with an orange coloured throat and chest. Its long slender body, short limbs, broad feet, and sharp claws make the marten well adapted for climbing trees, travelling across the forest floor and snow, and for capturing mice and voles that are its main foods.

Marten once flourished throughout Atlantic Canada in the boreal forest. However since the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, three of the four Atlantic province’s have seen their populations either become extinct (PEI) or at risk of extirpation (Nfld., NS). In Nova Scotia, marten populations have been listed as “Endangered” under the Endangered Species Act (1998).

Once thought to be widespread across Nova Scotia during the late 1800’s, by the early 1900’s, marten populations had declined drastically due to over-harvesting. Today, marten in Nova Scotia are split between two populations; western Nova Scotia and the Cape Breton Highlands.

The western mainland population is a result of a re-introduction program in Kejimikujik National Park between 1987 and 1994 with animals brought in from New Brunswick. Marten had been extirpated from the mainland by 1935. A recent preliminary study suggested that the western population has increased and expanded from the original release sites. However, the status of the population is unknown.

The relic Cape Breton Highlands population is highly fragmented and distributed between two disjunct sub-populations. Based on all available information, (which includes historical data, winter track/bait stations surveys, unusual sighting reports from trappers and the general public), marten numbers in the highlands are at a critically low level. Because of the small fragmented population, the loss of genetic diversity due to inbreeding could become a threat to the remaining marten in Cape Breton. Other threats which could have a major effect on small disjunct populations are loss of habitat quality and quantity, and stochastic or random events (i.e. disease, extreme weather, forest fires, etc.). Given the small population size and isolation of the individuals, every animal becomes an important link in the survival of the species. If trappers know or suspect there maybe the slightest chance that an animal may be inadvertently trapped in their area, then these areas should be avoided.

Since 1997, there have been only nine records of marten in Cape Breton. As a result of these continuing low numbers, a recovery effort has been untaken by DNR to re-establish a free-living marten population in Cape Breton. The initial step has been to establish a recovery team that consists of scientists and experts from goernment and other stakeholders. Out of the the recovery team, various field studies have been initiated to begin to piece together habitat requirements, availability and prey abundance for marten in Cape Breton. In addition to these studies, a concerted effort has been initiated to try to map out the distribution and gain a better understanding of the number of animals that remain.

An essential piece in the recovery process is stewardship. In order for the recovery of any species to be successful, all major stakeholders (forest practitioners, fur harvesters, landowners, aboriginal peoples) including the general public must become involved in the recovery effort. Local people have valuable information on past and present sightings that can be used to access potential habitat. Knowing where marten have been and where they may be, will allow researchers to live-trap and tag individuals. This would provide opportunities to gain information (habitat use, home range size, age, sex) about marten in Cape Breton that is not currently known. The education of the public in the ecology of marten, sets the stage for the potential of a successful recovery of the population.

What can you do to help? Marten are attracted to many types of bait exposing them to many different traps and trap sets, including those made for mink, squirrels and fisher. In other jurisdictions snares set for snowshoe hare have under certain circumstances killed marten. Trappers may not be thinking of incidental catches when setting traps for other species. Any live animals should immediately be released. If an animal is trapped and cannot be released, then every effort should be made to turn in all of these animals to a D.N.R. office. There are now a couple of options available to trappers to handle these animals. Bring any marten specimens (even if they are old) to your local DNR office. Report any sightings of live marten, marten captured in traps, scats, or tracks to the DNR office in your area or to the Wildlife Division in Kentville (902) 679-6091. DNR and the Marten Recovery Team looks forward to working with local fur harvesters in the successful recovery of this species.




2002 Trappers Workshop and

Annual Meeting

Kentville, March 7 - 9, 2003

Sleeping space available -
bring your own bedroll.

Contact:
Paul Tufts, President,
Trappers Association of Nova Scotia
for details.
Phone: 742-2771
Fax: 742-1277

The 2002 Trappers Workshop was held in Kentville. To-date we have held 50 workshops with over 1,462 students.

See Also

www.trappersassociationofnovascotia.ca/convention.html





Black Bear

Resident bear hunting license sales appear to be stable at about 500 for the past five years. Non-resident bear hunter numbers took a slight downturn in 2001 but have remained relatively stable at slightly over 100 during the past six years. Sale of bear hunting licenses to both resident and non-residents have been effected by debate/discussion on sale of parts, baiting, and perhaps abundance of deer. Trapper interest in taking bear is also influenced by these factors but also by sale price offered for the hides. The average sale price of bear hides has climbed to well over $100 during the past three years, with best pelts going for as high as $400. This may in part explain the increasing number of snaring license sales in the past few years.

Hunter success in 2001 was 35.2% while trappers achieved a 38% success rate. Table 1 provides a summary of license types/numbers issued and harvest by hunters and trappers.

Table #1

Bear Harvest Summary 1993-2001

Year License Res. License Non-Res. Hunter Harvest Hunter Success Snaring Permits Snaring Harvest Snaring Success
1993 286 44 111 44.2% 129 60 46.5
1994 481 37 272 44.8% 181 110 60.7
1995 704 81 254 32.4% 227 72 40.1
1996 656 102 223 29.3% 184 68 36.2
1997 540 116 163 24.8% 162 66 40.3
1998 505 109 220 35.8% 142 65 45.5
1999 522 123 208 32.2% 101 33 32.4
2000 498 153 264 40.6% 127 54 42.9
2001 544 101 226 35.0% 155 59 34.6


The age of our bears are determined by a company in the United States which specializes in this work. Due to the time it takes to gather and ship all teeth submitted by hunters & trappers throughout the province and job scheduling by the company, results often do not come back until the fall of the following year. We do try to advise hunters/trappers of the age of their bear when the results eventually come in if this information has been requested. If after a year you have not yet been advised of the age of your bear, contact your local DNR office, and make sure you provide the number of the bear hunting stamp under which authority the bear was taken.

Nova Scotia is one of the few remaining Canadian jurisdictions that continues to allow the sale of bear gall bladders. In 1997 it became mandatory in Nova Scotia, to have bear galls sealed by DNR before sale or export. The number of galls sealed by DNR each year since 1997, compared to number of bear galls exported from the province is presented in Table 2.

Table #2
Bear Gall Seals Issued and Galls Exported
From Nova Scotia 1997-2001

Year
Seals Issued
Galls Exported
1997 107 93
1998 92 5
1999 49 23
2000 78 27
2001 71 20
2002 to Date UK 32


<>As can be seen, the number of bear gall seals issued by DNR each year, far exceeds the number of galls actually exported from the province. Many hunters/trappers recover the gall and have it sealed but later find there is little if any value for a gall that weighs less than 25 grams. When the age profile of bears harvested and the fact that young bears seldom have galls weighing more than 15 - 20 grams, the low number of galls that actually sell makes sense. The high number of galls exported in 1997 was a costly learning experience for the furbuyer/exporter when he subsequently learned that the buyer was not interested in small galls. Nte: Bear galls sealed and or exported in a particular year may have been hunted/snared the previous year(s).


Tick Collection and Lyme Disease in Nova Scotia

There has recently been a reported case of a person from the south shore area of Nova Scotia having Lyme disease. As well, a deer tick (Ixodes scapularis) found in Antigonish County has tested positive for the Lyme disease agent. Department of Natural Resources is assisting NS Department of Health in doing a risk assessment of this disease in the province.

Furharvesters are active in all areas of the province, handle a variety of animals and are accustomed to doing close inspection of animals/pelts. Therefore, you have the ability to provide valuable assistance in this matter.

Any ticks you find on animals or on yourself/clothing this fall, you are asked to place in a small container (plastic bag, film canister, etc.) and submit to the local DNR office. It is important to record where the tick was found and what species of animal or who (person’s name) it was found on.

Ticks you submit to DNR will be sent to the entomologist at Shubenacadie for identification. All deer ticks will be sent to a federal laboratory to determine if it is a carrier of the Lyme disease agent.

Your assistance with this investigation would be greatly appreciated.

Contact: Eric Georgeson - Provincial Entomologist, at 758-7238, or Tony Nette - Manager, Wildlife Resources, at 679-6140