![]() |
||
![]() |
Kaufman Report | ![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Department of Justice |
Acknowledgements
Time LineChapter I: Scope and Nature of the Review
1. THE MANDATEChapter II: Historical Overview
2. "APPROPRIATE, FAIR AND REASONABLE"
3. LIMITATIONS OF MANDATE
4. USE OF TERMINOLOGY
5. PRIVACY ISSUES
6. LEGAL PRIVILEGE
7. EFFECTS OF ABUSE
8. THE PROCESS
9. FUNDING
10.STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT1. HISTORY OF RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS IN NOVA SCOTIAChapter III: Formulation of The Government Response(a) Shelburne Youth Centre2. REPORTED ABUSE PRIOR TO 1994
(b) Nova Scotia School for Girls
(c) Nova Scotia Youth Training Centre(a) Policies
(b) Police Investigations
(i) Shelburne School for Boys
(ii) Nova Scotia School for Girls1. EVENTS LEADING TO THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSEChapter IV: The Samuels-Stewart Audit
2. FORMULATION OF THE THREE-PRONGED RESPONSE
3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
4. ANALYSIS1. THE AUDIT'S MANDATEChapter V: The Stratton Report
2. CONTENTS OF THE REPORT(a) Introduction3. THE ACCOMPANYING LETTER
(b) Process and Participation
(c) The Auditor's Findings
(i) An understanding of abuse
(ii) Whether young offenders currently in custody are protected from abuse
(iii) Whether young offenders currently in custody are being abused
(d) Conclusions and Recommendations of the Report
4. GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO AUDIT REPORT
5. THE OMBUDSMAN'S OFFICE
6. INTERVIEW WITH MS. SAMUELS-STEWART
7. ANALYSIS1. INTRODUCTIONChapter VI: The Origin of the Compensation Program
2. CONDUCT OF THE INVESTIGATION
3. SHELBURNE SCHOOL FOR BOYS
4. SYDNEY CHILDREN'S TRAINING CENTRE
5. NOVA SCOTIA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS
6. DARTMOUTH CHILDREN'S TRAINING CENTRE
7. NOVA SCOTIA YOUTH TRAINING CENTRE
8. THE LALO CASE
9. ANALYSIS1. BACKGROUNDChapter VII: The Memorandum of Understanding
2. THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF JULY 20, 1995
3. ANALYSIS
4. NEGOTIATIONS
5. ANALYSIS1. INTRODUCTIONChapter VIII: The Commencement of Investigations
2. ELIGIBILITY
3 COMPENSATION CATEGORIES
4. PROCESS
5. FILE REVIEW
6. COUNSELLING AND OTHER BENEFITS
7. LEGAL FEES
8. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
9. ANALYSIS1. INTRODUCTIONChapter IX: The Early Days
2. FORMATION OF THE INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT
3. OPERATION OF THE INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT
4. ANALYSIS1. PREPARATIONS FOR THE MOUChapter X: Events During the Suspension
2. THE EARLY OPERATION OF THE MOU
3. EVENTS LEADING TO THE SUSPENSION OF THE PROGRAM
4. AUDIT OF CLAIM FILES
5. ANALYSIS1. INTRODUCTIONChapter XI: Resumption of the Program
2. REACTION TO THE SUSPENSION
3. DIFFICULTIES IDENTIFIED BY THE ASSESSORS
4. MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1996
5. DUTY TO REPORT ABUSE
6. ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE RESUMPTION OF THE PROGRAM
7. ANALYSIS1. INTRODUCTIONChapter XII: Completion of the Program
2. DEVELOPMENTS AFTER RESUMPTION
3. MEETING THE DEADLINE OF APRIL 18, 1997
4. THE COURT CHALLENGE
5. POLYGRAPHS
6. CLAIMANT INTERVIEWS, DISCLOSURE ISSUES AND MEDICAL RELEASES
7. CALLS FOR A PUBLIC INQUIRY
8. CONCERNS OVER FRAUD
9. FILE REVIEWS BEFORE THE GUIDELINES
10. NOVEMBER 6, 1997, GUIDELINES
11. AUDIT OF RANDOMLY SELECTED CLAIM FILES
12. ANALYSIS1. INTRODUCTIONChapter XIII: Impact of the Compensation Program
2. STATUS OF THE PROGRAM AFTER THE GUIDELINES
3. POLYGRAPH EVIDENCE
4. IN-PERSON FILE REVIEWS
5. AUDIT OF RANDOMLY SELECTED CLAIM FILES
6. SNAPSHOT AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2001
7. SURVEY OF THE FILE REVIEWERS
8. STATISTICS
9. COSTS
10. ANALYSIS1.IMPACT ON CLAIMANTSChapter XIV: The Memorandum of Agreement for Employees
2. IMPACT ON EMPLOYEES
(a) Dr. David Syer
(b) Dr. John Keeler
(c) The Employees and their Families
3. IMPACT OF MEDIA
4. ANALYSIS1. 1994 - 1997Chapter XV: The IIU Report
2. JANUARY 1997 - JULY 1998
3. THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
4. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
5. ANALYSIS1. INTRODUCTIONChapter XVI: Events Outside Nova Scotia
2. BACKGROUND AND MATERIALS REVIEWED
3. FINDINGS
(a) Context of the Compensation Program
(b) Absence of Contemporaneous Complaints
(c) Problems with the Statements of Claimants
(d) The Stratton Findings
(e) Collusion
(f) Absence of Supporting Medical Evidence
(g) The Institutional Environment
(h) Contradictory Evidence
4. THE REPORT'S CONCLUSION
5. ANALYSIS1. INTRODUCTIONChapter XVII: Report of the Law Commission of Canada
2. ONTARIO - GRANDVIEW TRAINING SCHOOL FOR GIRLS
(a) Details of the Compensation Package
(i) General Benefits
(ii) Group Benefits
(iii) Individual Benefits
(b) The Process
3. ONTARIO - ST. JOHN'S AND ST. JOSEPH'S TRAINING SCHOOLS
(a) The Process
(b) Details of the Compensation Package
4. ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS ON ONTARIO INSTITUTIONS
5. ONTARIO - GEORGE EPOCH
(a) The Process
(b) Details of the Compensation Package
6. NEW BRUNSWICK
(a) The Process
(b) Details of the Compensation Package
7. NEWFOUNDLAND
8. BRITISH COLUMBIA
(a) The Process
(b) Details of the Compensation Package
9. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
(a) Framework Agreement #1
(b) Framework Agreement #2
10. ANALYSIS1. INTRODUCTION
2. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS BY THE LAW COMMISSION
(a) Why Abuse Occurred
(b) Types of Abuse Suffered
3. THE APPROACH OF THE LAW COMMISSION
4. CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF REDRESS OPTIONS
5. PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE
6. RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE
(a) The Criminal Justice Process
(b) Civil Actions
(c) Public Inquiries
(d) Ex Gratia Payments
(e) Criminal Injuries Compensation Programs
7. REDRESS PROGRAMS
8. THE OPERATION OF REDRESS PROGRAMS
(a) Input
(b) Beneficiaries
(c) Harms
(d) Range of Benefits
(e) Level of Benefits
(f) Validation
(g) Outreach
(h) Duration
(i) Administration
9. ASSESSING A REDRESS PROGRAM
(a) Respect, Engagement and Informed Choice
(b) Fact-finding
(c) Accountability
(d) Fairness
(e) Acknowledgment, Apology and Reconciliation
(f) Compensation, Counselling and Education
(g) Needs of Families, Communities and Peoples
(h) Prevention and Public Education
(i) Conclusion
10. RESPONSE TO CRITICISMS OF REDRESS PROGRAMS
11. RECOMMENDATIONS
(a) Recommendations Respecting Redress Programs
(b) General RecommendationsChapter XVIII: Recommendations and Conclusion
INTRODUCTIONConclusion
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGNING A GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
INITIAL RESPONSE TO REPORTS OF INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE
THE INTERIM STATUS OF ALLEGED ABUSERS
POLICIES RESPECTING INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS
THE NATURE AND TIMING OF INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS
PROTECTING RESIDENTS FROM ABUSE
AUDITS OF EXISTING POLICIES
TRADITIONAL LITIGATION AND OTHER ALTERNATIVES
General Observations
Avoidance of Speculative Myths, Stereotypes and Generalized Assumptions
Credible Validation within Either Traditional Litigation or Redress Programs
THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF A CREDIBLE VALIDATION PROCESS
ACCOMMODATIONS WITHIN A CREDIBLE VALIDATION PROCESS
PRIOR VALIDATION OF ABUSE
LOWER VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS
Once Abuse Has Been Validated
Where Allegations Do Not Involve Criminality
Where Counselling or Therapy is Sought
DETERMINING WHEN TO ADOPT A REDRESS PROGRAM
Relevant Considerations
Widespread or Systemic Abuse
An evidentiary foundation
Use of an independent investigation
Public inquiries
Police investigations
The Status of Criminal Proceedings
The Extent to which Current Employees are Allegedly Involved
The Needs and Interests of True Victims of Abuse
Fiscal Responsibility
Balancing the Relevant Considerations
INVESTIGATIONS TO VALIDATE ABUSE FOR COMPENSATION PURPOSES
ACCOMMODATION WITHIN A LITIGATION FRAMEWORK
RANGE OF BENEFITS AVAILABLE TO REDRESS PROGRAMS
MONETARY COMPENSATION
Compensation Grid
Monetary Ceilings
Periodic Payments v. Lump Sums
COUNSELLING
ADDITIONAL NON-MONETARY BENEFITS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND APOLOGIES
BENEFICIARIES OF A REDRESS PROGRAM
CONDUCT ATTRACTING REDRESS
PROCESS ISSUES
Informed Decisions
The Formation of a Claimant Advocacy Group
Consultation with Affected Groups
Relinquishing the Right to Sue
Dispute Resolution
The Deadline for Filing a Claim
Promoting Consistency in Fact finding
Training for Those Conducting or Administering a Process
Appellate Review
Evaluation of the Government Response
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This page and all contents are copyright
© 1998-2001,
Province
of Nova Scotia,
all rights reserved. Please send comments to: Department of Justice at justweb@gov.ns.ca |